Cotton lint
Pivot · irrigated
Hale County: 145,000 ac planted 2025 ·10-year avg 231,780 ac
Starter from the District 2 cotton pivot budget; price, yield and base cost can be changed
Your starting yield: 1,000 lb lint/ac (entered, not reduced).
Between your entries, RowMath uses a straight line. Blank keeps your starting yield on that side. Use the same crop unit and weight basis in all three rows.
| Case | Rain, inches | Yield, lb lint/ac |
|---|---|---|
| Dry case | Rain in your dry-year comparison. It changes water needs and pumping costs. Source: NOAA county rain records; starting dry case 13.29 inches/year. Current: 13.29 inches/year. | Harvest per planted acre in your dry case, in lb lint. Use a dry harvest from your records. Blank uses the starting yield of 1,000 lb lint/acre. This changes dry-case sales. Current: not entered. |
| Starting case | 19.15 | 1,000 |
| Wet case | Rain in your wet-year comparison. It changes water needs and pumping costs. Source: NOAA county rain records; starting wet case 26.68 inches/year. Current: 26.68 inches/year. | Harvest per planted acre in your wet case, in lb lint. Use a wet harvest from your records. Blank uses the starting yield of 1,000 lb lint/acre. This changes wet-case sales. Current: not entered. |
These rain amounts come from county records. You can change them.
Planning estimate · Published reference · 2015-12 · gross irrigation inches · Marked reviewed; not verified by this tool
Source reference: INFERENCE: TAWC 2014 report Table A22 p199 (PDF206): 2011 dry-year applied irrigation / 2005-2013 crop-year mean / 2010 wet-year applied irrigation. Observational scenarios across changing farms, not crop requirements or a calibrated weather response; 2011 pumping could still be insufficient. Cost budgets and yields are separate assumptions. TAWC 2014 Table A22 PDF p206, fetched 2026-11-05. Reference rainfall 16.9 inches annual (2005–2013); county monthly pattern used for effective-rain adjustment.. Region: Texas South Plains. Original: 13.6. Accessed: 2026-11-05.
Enter water you pump. Normal county rain is already taken off. More rain means less pumping. Starter rain reference: 16.9 inches in a year.
Need in this scenario: 12.6 irrigation inches · May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep.
The estimate starts from your yield at your starting rain. The yield choice beside rain applies to every comparison.
A planning estimate, not a harvest forecast. Your entered yield is used exactly at your starting rain. Other rain amounts change supported estimates relative to that starting point. Crops without an estimate keep your entered yield unless you set your own rain scenarios. Seasonal totals miss heat, rain timing and peak flow.
Planning estimate: typed yield anchored at your starting rain with entered farm water. Case response / starting response; ceiling is full-water yield (not reached). Net irrigation need plus effective rain and stored water is an ET proxy. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 33 (1979), whole-season yield response factors; relation reviewed in FAO Paper 66 (2012). Generic crop transfer; not calibrated for this farm. Whole-season Ky 0.85 (dimensionless). Your entered yield: 1,000 lb lint/acre. Full-water supply proxy: 15.9 net inches/acre; effective rain 5.2 inches/acre.
Zero means no stored water counted. It is not a soil test.
Count only stored water already allowed for in your water need. Otherwise change that need too.
FAO crop yield response to waterPlanted May · harvested Oct, Nov, Dec. Water: May, Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep.
Water shares are estimates you can edit. Check your soil moisture and cut dates.
Relative water shares: 0 means no pumping that month. Shares are divided by their total. At least one month must be above 0.
Local irrigation months come from the supplied AgriLife summer-crop synthesis; USDA planting dates do not establish irrigation shares.
AgriLife High Plains wheat uses and harvest
AgriLife forage species and growth
AgriLife spring irrigation priorities
AgriLife High Plains irrigation timing
AgriLife caution: near Lubbock the practical wheat planting cutoff is about February 1; oats are suggested after that. February–March wheat is not a dependable grain starter here. Review every water month; changing planting month does not move irrigation automatically.
Monthly effective rain and irrigation floors; annual rain follows the county normal monthly pattern.
Irrigation starting depth uses 2005–2013 observations. Local storm timing is unverified.
SourcesYour base total, plus or minus the cost changes shown below.
- $390.00
- -$2.45
- +$200.00
- Total production cost
- $587.55
Base: Example amount, not a published budget. Seed, fertilizer and other production costs are within this base total.
Returns use your base total with the changes above.
Texas A&M AgriLife 2026 budget, District 2, irrigated cotton. Category amounts include your current pumping, harvest and loan changes.
- Gross revenue
- $800.00
- Cottonseed revenue (included above)
- $100.00
- Included production costs
- −$587.55
- Margin above included costs
- $212.45
- Other specified costs · not entered
- —
- Return before cash rent
- $212.45
District 2 budget categories total $724.03/acre, with current cost changes. Your $587.55/acre total is $136.48 lower.
Your base adds $200.00/acre for harvest. The category sum includes $215.00/acre for current harvest and delivery.
Opening this table keeps your total. Change a row to use the sum below. Interest is in Other in the breakdown.
Published value · Published reference · 2026-02 · USD/gross acre-inch · Marked reviewed; not verified by this tool
Source reference: 2026D2CottonPivot.pdf p1, Energy Cost row, fetched 2026-11-05; $10/gross acre-inch × 10 budget inches. INFERENCE: treating budget AcreInch as gross applied depth for this planning transfer; farm/system applicability editable.. Region: Not regionally calibrated. Original: 10.00. Accessed: 2026-11-05.
Published value · Published reference · 2026-02 · gross irrigation inches · Marked reviewed; not verified by this tool
Source reference: 2026D2CottonPivot.pdf p1, Energy Cost row, fetched 2026-11-05; $10/gross acre-inch × 10 budget inches. INFERENCE: treating budget AcreInch as gross applied depth for this planning transfer; farm/system applicability editable.. Region: Not regionally calibrated. Original: 10. Accessed: 2026-11-05.
We take out the old pump cost. Then we add the cost of water pumped now.
The original allowance uses $10.00 per acre-inch. Your entered rate prices the current pumping need.
These are example costs. The cost table above shows the base total and changes for pumping, harvest and interest. Land rent is separate.
Base cost leaves out pumping? Open Irrigation. Set “Pumped inches in base cost” to zero.
Planning estimate · Planning assumption · 2026-11-01 · USD/lb lint · Marked reviewed; not verified by this tool
Source reference: Synthetic teaching case; not a farm record or regional default. Region: Not regionally calibrated. Original: 0.20. Accessed: 2026-11-01.
Lease and crop-share terms are entered once in Farm details.
Planning estimate · Planning assumption · 2026-11-01 · seed tons/lint lb · Marked reviewed; not verified by this tool
Source reference: Synthetic teaching case; not a farm record or regional default. Region: Not regionally calibrated. Original: 0.0005. Accessed: 2026-11-01.
Planning estimate · Planning assumption · 2026-11-01 · USD/seed ton · Marked reviewed; not verified by this tool
Source reference: Synthetic teaching case; not a farm record or regional default. Region: Not regionally calibrated. Original: 200.00. Accessed: 2026-11-01.
- Price: inferred · Synthetic teaching case; not a farm record or regional default
- Yield: matched · CONFIRMED: 2026D2CottonPivot.pdf p1 REVENUE quantity, fetched 2026-11-05. Published budget planning yield, not a measured farm result.
- Production cost: inferred · Synthetic teaching case; not a farm record or regional default
- Water: inferred · INFERENCE: TAWC 2014 report Table A22 p199 (PDF206): 2011 dry-year applied irrigation / 2005-2013 crop-year mean / 2010 wet-year applied irrigation. Observational scenarios across changing farms, not crop requirements or a calibrated weather response; 2011 pumping could still be insufficient. Cost budgets and yields are separate assumptions. TAWC 2014 Table A22 PDF p206, fetched 2026-11-05. Reference rainfall 16.9 inches annual (2005–2013); county monthly pattern used for effective-rain adjustment.
- Harvest: inferred · Synthetic teaching case; not a farm record or regional default
Synthetic cash costs; harvest/haul follows yield for grain/lint; energy and premium within base example cost; rent excluded unless entered.
Sourcesyour figure; the tool does not model insurance
Keep last year’s numbers here. Try them next year. Your typed plan values stay yours.
Cost is production cost, before rent and other fixed costs.
Residue after harvest
Stalks and leaves left after harvest. Choose what stays on the field and what leaves. Open Soil value inputs and nutrient breakdown below, then choose What happens to stalks. Set grazing dollars beside Grazing after harvest.Baseline nutrient-value equivalent on your typed typical yield: 1,000 lb lint/acre. Scenario levers do not change this baseline.
Stalks and leaves left after harvest. Set What happens to stalks under Soil value inputs and nutrient breakdown.
Needs your input · Planning assumption · 2026-11-01 · USD/ac · Unconfirmed input · UNRESOLVED: inspected D2 cotton budget sells lint and seed, with no stalk-grazing line. No matched cotton residue quantity and nutrients verified; blank is not zero.
Source reference: UNRESOLVED: inspected D2 cotton budget sells lint and seed, with no stalk-grazing line. No matched cotton residue quantity and nutrients verified; blank is not zero.. Region: Not regionally calibrated. Original: not available. Accessed: 2026-11-05.
A fixed lease payment stays the same when yield changes. Choose Production-dependent above if payment falls with yield.
Not included. Enter a lease receipt; the omitted dollar amount is unknown.
This is not cash. It is left out of profit and does not cut your plant food bill.
Enter your weights and prices under Soil value inputs and nutrient breakdown.
Grazing or baling can leave less on the field. Enter the share left. Effects on soil and water are not priced.
Weight left: not entered tons per acre.
N not entered lb (Needs entries); P2O5 not entered lb (Needs entries); K2O not entered lb (Needs entries).
Stalks, leaves and burs after lint harvest. Usually shred or leave; usually no residue-grazing receipt. Follow local stalk-destruction requirements.
Residue left: not entered short tons/ac. N not entered lb (Needs entries); P2O5 not entered lb (Needs entries); K2O not entered lb (Needs entries). UNRESOLVED: inspected D2 cotton budget sells lint and seed, with no stalk-grazing line. No matched cotton residue quantity and nutrients verified; blank is not zero. Value of plant food left in stalks and leaves. This is not cash or a cut to your fertilizer bill.
Grazing or baling removes residue and can lower the soil value. Enter the fraction left; grazing returns some nutrients in manure unevenly, which this simple model does not price. Moisture, erosion and organic-matter benefits are not priced.
Extension residue-management context, 2026-10-01. Accessed November 5, 2026. General context only; no numeric starter verified for this crop and harvest method.
Choose the checkbox to count grazing lease income. Changing what stays on the field does not count sales. Baled stalk sales are not included.
To count them, use total sales per acre for the crop, including both crop and stalk sales.
Add the missing soil value inputs. Blank does not mean zero.
Enter residue tons per harvested unit. Enter N lb per residue ton. Enter P2O5 lb per residue ton. Enter K2O lb per residue ton.
Needs your input · Planning assumption · 2026-11-01 · short tons/harvested unit · Unconfirmed input · UNRESOLVED: inspected D2 cotton budget sells lint and seed, with no stalk-grazing line. No matched cotton residue quantity and nutrients verified; blank is not zero.
Source reference: UNRESOLVED: inspected D2 cotton budget sells lint and seed, with no stalk-grazing line. No matched cotton residue quantity and nutrients verified; blank is not zero.. Region: Not regionally calibrated. Original: not available. Accessed: 2026-11-05.
Planning estimate · Planning assumption · 2026-11-01 · fraction · Marked reviewed; not verified by this tool
Source reference: Planning assumption: all residue left, before grazing or baling; enter your own retained fraction. Region: Not regionally calibrated. Original: 1. Accessed: 2026-11-01.
Needs your input · Planning assumption · 2026-11-01 · lb N/short ton residue (same moisture basis) · Unconfirmed input · UNRESOLVED: inspected D2 cotton budget sells lint and seed, with no stalk-grazing line. No matched cotton residue quantity and nutrients verified; blank is not zero.
Source reference: UNRESOLVED: inspected D2 cotton budget sells lint and seed, with no stalk-grazing line. No matched cotton residue quantity and nutrients verified; blank is not zero.. Region: Not regionally calibrated. Original: not available. Accessed: 2026-11-05.
Needs your input · Planning assumption · 2026-11-01 · lb P2O5/short ton residue (same moisture basis) · Unconfirmed input · UNRESOLVED: inspected D2 cotton budget sells lint and seed, with no stalk-grazing line. No matched cotton residue quantity and nutrients verified; blank is not zero.
Source reference: UNRESOLVED: inspected D2 cotton budget sells lint and seed, with no stalk-grazing line. No matched cotton residue quantity and nutrients verified; blank is not zero.. Region: Not regionally calibrated. Original: not available. Accessed: 2026-11-05.
Needs your input · Planning assumption · 2026-11-01 · lb K2O/short ton residue (same moisture basis) · Unconfirmed input · UNRESOLVED: inspected D2 cotton budget sells lint and seed, with no stalk-grazing line. No matched cotton residue quantity and nutrients verified; blank is not zero.
Source reference: UNRESOLVED: inspected D2 cotton budget sells lint and seed, with no stalk-grazing line. No matched cotton residue quantity and nutrients verified; blank is not zero.. Region: Not regionally calibrated. Original: not available. Accessed: 2026-11-05.
Planning estimate · Published reference · 2026-10-30 · USD/lb N · Marked reviewed; not verified by this tool
Source reference: Iowa Production Cost Report, page 1 average FOB asks: liquid N (32-0-0) 510 USD/short ton; MAP (11-52-0) 976; potash (0-0-60) 499.80. N = 510/(2000*.32) = .796875 USD/lb; P2O5 = (976/2000-.11*.796875)/.52 = .7698918269230769 USD/lb after crediting MAP nitrogen; K2O = 499.80/(2000*.60) = .4165 USD/lb. Iowa price starters, not Texas delivered prices; enter your own. Live URL changes; retained-body hash in RESIDUE-SOURCES.md.. Region: Iowa USDA AMS, 2026-10-30; enter your own. Original: 0.80. Accessed: 2026-11-05.
Planning estimate · Published reference · 2026-10-30 · USD/lb P2O5 · Marked reviewed; not verified by this tool
Source reference: Iowa Production Cost Report, page 1 average FOB asks: liquid N (32-0-0) 510 USD/short ton; MAP (11-52-0) 976; potash (0-0-60) 499.80. N = 510/(2000*.32) = .796875 USD/lb; P2O5 = (976/2000-.11*.796875)/.52 = .7698918269230769 USD/lb after crediting MAP nitrogen; K2O = 499.80/(2000*.60) = .4165 USD/lb. Iowa price starters, not Texas delivered prices; enter your own. Live URL changes; retained-body hash in RESIDUE-SOURCES.md.. Region: Iowa USDA AMS, 2026-10-30; enter your own. Original: 0.77. Accessed: 2026-11-05.
Planning estimate · Published reference · 2026-10-30 · USD/lb K2O · Marked reviewed; not verified by this tool
Source reference: Iowa Production Cost Report, page 1 average FOB asks: liquid N (32-0-0) 510 USD/short ton; MAP (11-52-0) 976; potash (0-0-60) 499.80. N = 510/(2000*.32) = .796875 USD/lb; P2O5 = (976/2000-.11*.796875)/.52 = .7698918269230769 USD/lb after crediting MAP nitrogen; K2O = 499.80/(2000*.60) = .4165 USD/lb. Iowa price starters, not Texas delivered prices; enter your own. Live URL changes; retained-body hash in RESIDUE-SOURCES.md.. Region: Iowa USDA AMS, 2026-10-30; enter your own. Original: 0.42. Accessed: 2026-11-05.